mirage

Electronic Theses and Dissertations

DSpace/Manakin Repository

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Jones, Dr. Alvin H.
dc.creator Houk, Donald F.
dc.date 1974-06-11
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-22T23:59:58Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-22T23:59:58Z
dc.date.issued 1974-06-11
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/199531 en
dc.description.abstract This study surveyed the significance of participants to be in agreement with the training program's philosophy, if he is to evaluate the program as being a success. Without this agreement the program is assumed to be considered poor and evaluated accordingly. There were eighty-four managers and supervisors who took part in this study. The major findings were as follows: those who were in disagreement with the program's philosophies evaluated the overall program, which includes content and presentation, as being only fair or poor in quality; those who were in agreement, evaluated the program as being either excellent or good quality. The data indicated that all of the null hypotheses were rejected. There was significant difference in the proportion of frequencies in the .managers and supervisors population who agree with the philosophical position of the instructor and the participant's respective course evaluation. en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject Employees -- Training of en_US
dc.title The Affects a Participants Attitude Has on His Evaluation of a Training Program en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.contributor.primaryAdvisor Heslet, Dr. Frederick E.
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Counseling en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account

RSS Feeds